Rep. Jasmine Crockett completely lost her composure this weekend after the Supreme Court temporarily upheld Texas’ newly redrawn congressional maps, and the result was an expletive-filled rant that said far more about Democrats than it did about redistricting.
In a video posted to her YouTube account, Crockett went scorched earth on the Court, President Trump, and Republicans, accusing them of “rigging the system” and dropping multiple F-bombs along the way. It was not exactly the calm, thoughtful constitutional argument Democrats like to pretend they are making.
Crockett claimed that President Trump is “still doing his bidding” through state legislatures and governors to manipulate elections. She bizarrely praised Indiana and California for “fighting back,” then turned her anger directly on the Supreme Court. “F— you to the Supreme Court for what they did,” she said, reacting to a ruling she simply did not like.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) says “f*** you” to the Supreme Court for basically ending her political career by allowing Texas redistricting to go forward.
Crockett has given up running for her House seat and is now desperately running for Senate. She has no chance.
She’s fired! pic.twitter.com/iGuN09n7Am
— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) January 4, 2026
The decision she was melting down over was straightforward. In December, the Supreme Court ordered that Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s newly drawn congressional districts remain in place heading into the 2026 midterms. The maps could give Republicans up to five additional House seats. Democrats are furious, not because the process was illegal, but because the outcome does not favor them.
What makes Crockett’s tantrum especially rich is the selective outrage. Democrats gerrymander aggressively whenever they can. California Governor Gavin Newsom is openly pushing a ballot initiative to create five new Democrat-friendly districts. That is apparently “fighting back.” Texas doing the same thing within the law is suddenly an assault on democracy.
The new Texas maps also move Crockett out of her current district, a development that appears to have fast-tracked her decision to run for the U.S. Senate. Funny how “rigged systems” become personal the moment they affect a politician’s career prospects.
Unable to contain her frustration, Crockett pivoted to the usual Democratic fallback position, attacking the legitimacy of the Supreme Court itself. She renewed calls for court “reform,” including term limits and expansion, claiming that certain seats were “illegitimately gotten.” Translation, Democrats lost key cases, so now the institution must be punished.
Crockett cited her involvement with the Court Reform Now Task Force and argued that “shoring up democracy” starts with reshaping the Supreme Court. That argument only ever surfaces when Democrats fail to get their way through the courts. When rulings go in their favor, the Court is suddenly sacrosanct.
This episode perfectly captures the modern Democratic mindset. If voters choose Republicans, the system is broken. If courts uphold laws Democrats dislike, the justices are corrupt. If maps favor Democrats, it is justice. If they favor Republicans, it is tyranny.
Crockett’s rant was not principled dissent. It was a tantrum from an elected official furious that constitutional processes did not bend to her preferred outcome. And the profanity was not accidental. It was the point.
When Democrats start cursing the Supreme Court on camera, it is not because democracy is dying. It is because their grip on power is slipping, and they are not handling it well.
Oh stop. Democrats never cringe when she rants. They think “You go girl!”